PostHeaderIcon Should the Palestinian Territories declare statehood without further delay?

Most UN members would certainly recognize it and they would have full legal control over their territory and airspace as well as the waters off Gaza with their natural gas fields. Think of the advantages. Every zionist in what would then be Palestine would automatically become an illegal alien subject to immediate deportation,and yes,that’s international law,and a fundamental principle of sovereignty. Why wait?

Yes. They should have done it right after their only free election in early 2006. But it’s never too late.

I don’t understand the Pokie’s answer. The West Bank is a part of the Palestinian Territories. I thought that was well known.

I don’t understand Shay’s either. The Palestinian Territories are recognized by the UN and all it’s members,including the U.S. It has never been a part of the (unfortunately) legal entity known as "Israel". When did the PT merge merge with Israel?

News to me.

9 Responses to “Should the Palestinian Territories declare statehood without further delay?”

  • Maya says:

    The advantages of statehood are too numerous to list,so yes,by all means. The sooner the better. Arafat tried it in 1988 but that was a hollow affair,being a non-territorial entity. This time it would be different – very different. But it will take bolder leadership than we can expect from Mazen.
    References :

  • Pokieā„¢ says:

    and leave the occupied territories in the west bank for the illegal settlers? they won’t have any land to make a country. you can’t squeeze all those Palestinians in tiny Gaza which is already about to explode.
    References :

  • Zeno says:

    Yes. They should have done it right after their only free election in early 2006. But it’s never too late.

    I don’t understand the Pokie’s answer. The West Bank is a part of the Palestinian Territories. I thought that was well known.

    I don’t understand Shay’s either. The Palestinian Territories are recognized by the UN and all it’s members,including the U.S. It has never been a part of the (unfortunately) legal entity known as "Israel". When did the PT merge merge with Israel?

    News to me.
    References :

  • Grundelow says:

    Further delay? Uh, is 60 years further delay?

    The answer is "when they are ready and can demonstrate this"

    I say give them another 60.. and then another 60.. maybe 180 or more.
    References :

  • Ella says:

    Yes. I’m surprised they haven’t. The UN and the U.S. both recognize the P.A. as a government-to-be.
    References :

  • Galahad says:

    Indeed,without delay.
    References :

  • jd says:

    Boy are you fooling yourself. Listening to Maya again I see.
    References :

  • Kevin S says:

    Yes, but it would not solve all of the problems. Hamas will still see Israel as the enemy, if they don’t than let peace prosper. You mentioned oil reserves. Those do not matter since Britain has great control of them. Same with Jordan. History tells us that Britain never really wanted to create a Jewish state but was forced too because of Irgun terrorist attacks against them (more self defense), bribery (not so much of that as people actually think) American verbal aggression towards UN participants. From what I understand it had to do with oil. They believed that Palestine had oil. IT HAS EXTREMELY LITTLE. Therefore, they do not care about is as much anymore. The oil reserves from what I understand are not from the area of Gaza, or leaked into from Sinai, I’m not really sure. Because if it truly was from Gaza, Israel would have taken control of it a long time. If you can prove to me that they profit 100% from the reserves or more than 30%, then I am wrong.
    References :

  • Fatima says:

    The Palestine leaders do not want statehood; they want to drive the Jews out of Israel.
    References :

Leave a Reply